JS-Kit/Echo comments for article at http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2008/08/make-em-mad.html (9 comments)

  Tentative mapping of comments to original article, corrections solicited.

jsid-1218253285-595246  Silence at Sat, 09 Aug 2008 03:41:25 +0000

I have read rumors around the net that california gun dealers supported the law (requiring pre-approval from CADOJ before sending a gun into the state) that everybody is pissed about.


jsid-1218286675-595259  Heartless Libertarian at Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:57:55 +0000

If you want to really get the powers that be in the PRK to take notice, we have to get Glock to cease all sales and service to the state.

When the various LE agencies can't get their favored sidearms or parts and service for them, then they'll notice.


jsid-1218290920-595262  Kevin Baker at Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:08:40 +0000

Yes, and I'm sure the reaction of the legislature will be to sue Glock.


jsid-1218292579-595265  Ed "What the" Heckman at Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:36:19 +0000

Don't forget that Ronnie Barrett threw down the gauntlet against illegal gun bans years ago. I'm thrilled to see that they're no longer alone. Now if only the rest of the gun manufacturers and dealers would get on board!


jsid-1218295491-595268  Kevin Baker at Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:24:51 +0000

Ronnie Barrett was followed by STI, manufacturer of the most popular pistols in IDPA and IPSC.

Q. Will the recent California Microstamping Bill affect California specific products?
A. UPDATE We will be suspending all shipments of guns to California effective October 13, 2007. This includes everyone from civilians to Law Enforcement.


jsid-1218306485-595273  juris_imprudent at Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:28:05 +0000

@Silence-

I can almost guarantee you that CA gun dealers (individually or as an organization) do NOT support the crap flowing forth from Sacramento. This stuff emanates from the pols of L.A. and S.F. - where there aren't many gun dealers (legal ones that is).


jsid-1218330069-595304  DJ at Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:01:09 +0000

It appears Kimber isn't on board. I wonder why?


jsid-1218330985-595306  Kevin Baker at Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:16:25 +0000

It's that Capitalist profit-motive thing, I suspect. Consider, only Ronnie Barrett and STI are on board. That leaves . . . let me check,

Oh, yeah. EVERYBODY else!


jsid-1218417335-595362  DJ at Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:15:35 +0000

Sigh ...

I indulge myself in sarcasm and nobody gets it.


 Note: All avatars and any images or other media embedded in comments were hosted on the JS-Kit website and have been lost; references to haloscan comments have been partially automatically remapped, but accuracy is not guaranteed and corrections are solicited.
 If you notice any problems with this page or wish to have your home page link updated, please contact John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org>