[Esd-l] Security Warning Message as Attachment
John D. Hardin
jhardin at impsec.org
Wed Oct 16 19:56:01 PDT 2002
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, daniel lance herrick wrote:
> Doesn't the Sanitizer report belong in an
> X-Sanitizer: header? Even OutLook is willing to do
> its mail sorting on the basis of the content of
> headers. The Subject: header is not a suitable
> place for more than a flag.
X-Security.
Outlook may only let you filter on the headers Microsoft deems
interesting, and the X-Security header by itself is not a clear
indication of a problem.
The sanitizer could add an X-Security-Warning: header if a problem is
detected.
Votes? Subject line keyword or X-Security-Warning: header?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin at impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
-- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
63 days until The Two Towers
More information about the esd-l
mailing list