[Esd-l] LOGGING

John D. Hardin jhardin at impsec.org
Mon Nov 18 12:29:01 PST 2002


On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Kenneth Porter wrote:

> > The sanitizer is an unreasonably large filter script.
> 
> What's the reason for keeping the Perl inline in the procmail
> script? Is that just a matter of simplifying the packaging? Or is
> there an operational reason, as well? Seems like moving the Perl
> to a separate script would help to reduce log sizes quite a bit.

The primary reason is right now everything is in *one file*. I like
that model a lot. It eliminates problems with matching the procmail
part of things to the perl part of things.

Unfortunately the sanitizer has been pushing the limitations of that
model for a couple of years now. It will have to change soon.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin at impsec.org                        pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  ...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
                                              -- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   30 days until The Two Towers



More information about the esd-l mailing list