[Esd-l] LOGGING
John D. Hardin
jhardin at impsec.org
Mon Nov 18 12:29:01 PST 2002
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > The sanitizer is an unreasonably large filter script.
>
> What's the reason for keeping the Perl inline in the procmail
> script? Is that just a matter of simplifying the packaging? Or is
> there an operational reason, as well? Seems like moving the Perl
> to a separate script would help to reduce log sizes quite a bit.
The primary reason is right now everything is in *one file*. I like
that model a lot. It eliminates problems with matching the procmail
part of things to the perl part of things.
Unfortunately the sanitizer has been pushing the limitations of that
model for a couple of years now. It will have to change soon.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin at impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
-- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
30 days until The Two Towers
More information about the esd-l
mailing list