[Esd-l] problems with version 1.136 (Mangle MIME type to
TEXT/PLAIN, multipart/related inline images)
Peter van Campen
Peter.vanCampen at sci.kun.nl
Wed Nov 6 03:19:01 PST 2002
Hi,
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Peter van Campen wrote:
>
> > John D. Hardin wrote:
> > > Can anybody suggest a MIME type to use here? application/octet-stream
> > > runs the risk of triggering OS magic filetype determination and may
> > > not effectively prevent execution. text/plain apparently will cause
> > > some mailers to do textish things to the file (EOL conversions,
> > > maybe? Line wrap?)
> >
> > Maybe something like application/DEFANGEDoctet-stream ?
>
> A possibility. Would you be willing to change it to that locally and
> report results?
The tests that I did had positive results:
- with text/plain: 1 mail with an MS-Word attachment was incorrectly
saved by Eudora, and incorrectly shown on screen by MH.
- with application/octet-stream I do not have these problems.
- with application/DEFANGEDoctet-stream I do not have these problems either.
But the reason to go from application/octet-stream to text/plain apparently was
"to (hopefully) prevent magic scanning and execution."
How could I test whether application/DEFANGEDoctet-stream prevents those too?
(how about DEFANGEDapplication/DEFANGEDoctet-stream or application/27648DEFANGEDmsword)?
Regards,
Peter
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Peter.vanCampen at sci.kun.nl, Computer & Communications Dept, Faculty of Science
Nijmegen University, 6525 ED NIJMEGEN, The Netherlands, tel: +31 (0)24 3653535
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the esd-l
mailing list