[Esd-l] Smart reply

[Simon Matthews]

John,

If I understand correctly, you are going to look up the MX records for the 
domain listed in the Return-Path: and see if it matches the IP address in 
any (?) of the "Received:"  lines?

Interesting!

Simon

At 02:39 PM 5/17/02 -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
>All:
>
>Okay, I'm going to spend a little time trying to add a Smart Reply
>capability to the sanitizer (well, maybe a more accurate description
>would be Smart Reply Suppression).
>
>Basically, it'll check to see if the Return-Path: is supported by the
>domains in the Received: headers, and if not, it will turn off
>NOTIFY_SENDER. It may do the same if the message appears to have come
>via a mailing list.
>
>If you want to suppress this, you'd set SECURITY_DISABLE_SMART_REPLY
>and the notificatin would go out, regardless. In other words, the
>sanitizer will default to partial ("smart") sender notification.
>
>--
>  John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>  jhardin at impsec.org                        pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
>   768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
>  1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the moral
>   equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria to ensure the
>   livelihood of monastic scribes."
>                                     -- John Ippolito of the Guggenheim
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    900 days until the Presidential Election
>_______________________________________________
>Esd-l mailing list
>Esd-l at spconnect.com
>http://www.spconnect.com/mailman/listinfo/esd-l