[Esd-l] Problem with unmangling attachments
Eric Kwant
eric at kwantum.net
Tue Jun 4 09:33:01 PDT 2002
Excellent! Yes, that clarifies it. Thank you.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John D. Hardin" <jhardin at impsec.org>
To: "Eric Kwant" <eric at kwantum.net>
Cc: <Esd-l at spconnect.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Esd-l] Problem with unmangling attachments
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Eric Kwant wrote:
>
> > 2. Or is it just poisoned attachments that the sanitizer reacts
> > this way too, and regular (?) defanged attachments are not
> > severely disabled like this?
>
> It is just poisoned attachments that are mangled in this manner.
>
> MANGLE = change attachment filename
> POISON = change MIME header so attachment requires work to retrieve
> QUARANTINE = save poisoned message rather than delivering
>
> Does that clarify it any?
>
> --
> John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
> jhardin at impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
> 768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
> 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the moral
> equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria to ensure the
> livelihood of monastic scribes."
> -- John Ippolito of the Guggenheim
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 353 days until The Matrix Reloaded
More information about the esd-l
mailing list