[Esd-l] Alternatives to Sanitizer
John D. Hardin
jhardin at impsec.org
Sat Jul 20 21:04:00 PDT 2002
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Graham Dunn wrote:
> Mimedefang itself is a very basic filtering tool, but provides a
> very powerful framework to plug things like spammassassin / Anomy
> into it (has there ever been any work on getting the sanitizer
> into the mimedefang framework?).
No, there hasn't.
> Plusses:
>
> o runs as a milter, so multiple sendmails per message (in
> gateway configuration) is avoided, lowering overhead.
That's a pretty big plus.
> Minuses:
>
> o runs as a milter, so sendmail only (if you're not a sendmail
> shop).
That's a pretty big minus. I like being MTA-agnostic. I also like the
configuration flexibility that procmail provides.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin at impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
-- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
307 days until The Matrix Reloaded
More information about the esd-l
mailing list