[Esa-l] Double Extensions fails
John D. Hardin
jhardin at wolfenet.com
Wed Feb 14 06:55:58 PST 2001
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Michael Meltzer wrote:
> I don't understand why to block double extensions ? Is it not
> sufficient to block the (last) extension ?
Where you have a rule like *.VBS that's true.
If, however, you are not poisoning *.EXE, then you need the
double-extension rule to catch things like EXPLOIT.TXT.EXE
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/
jhardin at wolfenet.com pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin
768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Failure to plan ahead on someone else's part does not constitute an
emergency on my part.
- David W. Barts in a.s.r
<davidb at ce.washington.edu>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
108 days until Mir deorbits
More information about the esd-l
mailing list